|
30) Does the Act change who owns the party wall?
No. The
Act does not change the ownership of any wall, nor does it change the position
of any boundary. Boundaries can still run through the centre of a wall; and each
owner may technically own half of a wall. What the Act does do is set out
clearly what rights an owner has in relation to works to a party wall and what
he is obliged to do before he can exercise those rights.
31) Can the Act be used to resolve a boundary
dispute?
No. The Act does not contain any provision that could be
used to settle a boundary line dispute.
Such disputes can be resolved through the courts or through alternative
dispute resolution procedures (which may be simpler, quicker and cheaper), for
example mediation, decision by an independent expert or arbitration.
32) Does the Act supercede Common law rights?
Yes, but
only in relation to works covered by the Act.
33) Does the building owner have to wait for the full one or two
months after serving a notice before starting work?
No, so long as
the adjoining owner agrees, in writing, to the work starting earlier than as
stated in the notice.
34) What happens if an owner wants to build up to an existing
boundary wall which does not currently form part of a building and which is
wholly on their own land?
Under the Act the existing wall is not a
party fence wall because it does not stand astride the boundary line between
different properties. Nor is it a party wall because it does not separate
buildings of different owners. If a building owner wants to build a
new wall to replace the existing one, this work would be
covered by the Act; and he would have to serve a notice. If a building owner
wants to extend a building up
to the existing wall, then this
will not come under the Act (unless any proposed excavations will go deeper than
neighbouring foundations). In either event, the building owner will not have
created a new party wall. |